FIFA Panini (IT) (it.panini.fifacollection): Privacy & Security Findings

report - rfi-irfos
Skip to content

Permanent Disclosure Ledger

The discipline, demonstrated

On behalf of our research partners, we investigate publicly distributed Android and iOS apps: we decompile them, follow their code and data flows, and trace every connection to the servers it reaches. Hundreds of agents work through each app and join the technical evidence into one picture, which our specialists then review and verify.

387+
Android/iOS apps audited
Every app is decompiled at source-code level, not just scanned from outside.
1.04M+
Smali classes read
The full shipped code we have actually read, not an estimate.
262+
Critical findings recorded
Confirmed findings copied to regulators, not theoretical risks.
970+
Weak points found
Third-party tracking we have provably found inside the binary.
567+
Endpoints investigated
Real servers and countries where data actually flows.
132+
SDK instances mapped
Reusable libraries correlated across the entire corpus.
1 of 387 entries · sorted by elapsed ↓
Showing the report for FIFA Panini (IT).
OrganisationNotifiedStatusSevIntel (click to expand)StatutesResolvedDisclosureElapsedReport
FIFA Panini (IT)
Private
2026-06-25
92d ago
CS deflect
Medium
An officially licensed FIFA digital sticker-collecting app starts building tracking profiles of users before anyone has even opened it or agreed to anything. When RFI-IRFOS raised this, the company waited eleven days and then replied demanding proof of who RFI-IRFOS was before continuing, without ever addressing whether the actual technical finding was true.
it.panini.fifacollection v1.2.0. All five findings re-scored under CVSS v4.0, correcting to MEDIUM (pre-consent Firebase+ML Kit init, hardcoded Firebase key, mixed Unity/React Native AppsFlyer architecture) or LOW (allowBackup=true, undocumented phone-state/storage permissions). Panini S.p.A., Modena. Replied 11 days later via the site's own contact form with a non-technical letter demanding written proof of RFI-IRFOS's identity before any further exchange and requesting publication be withheld pending validation - declined same day, embargo confirmed unchanged. No technical rebuttal of any specific finding was ever received, before or after.
click to expand
GDPR Art. 7GDPR Art. 32GDPR Art. 5(1)(b)+1
Yes
Closed
Disclosure
92d 00h 00m 00s
Published
PDF

This ledger is updated in real time as companies respond. Silence is public. Severity is scored primarily by CVSS v4.0, we reserve the right to deviate based on blast radius.